Using Nasal Specs During Intubation Gives You More Time….

 January 8

by Jonathan Downham

Abstract Study Objective: To evaluate the influence of nasal oxygen (O2) administration on the duration of arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥95% during simulated difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients. Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: University hospital. Patients: 30 obese men undergoing general anesthesia. Interventions: After thorough preoxygenation, and using total intravenous anesthesia, simulated difficult laryngoscopy was performed, with half the patients receiving additional nasal O2 during apnea. Measurements: Duration of SpO2 ≥95% was measured up to a maximum of 6 minutes. Lowest SpO2 values and time to regain 100% SpO2 (resaturation time) also were recorded. Main Results: Nasal O2 administration was associated with significant prolongation of SpO2 ≥95% time (5.29 ± 1.02 vs. 3.49 ± 1.33 min, mean ± SD), a significant increase in patients with SpO2 ≥95% apnea at 6 minutes (8 vs. one pt), and significantly higher minimum SpO2 (94.3 ± 4.4% vs. 87.7 ± 9.3%). Resaturation times were no different between the groups. Conclusions: Nasal O2 administration is associated with significant increases in frequency and duration of SpO2 ≥95%, and higher minimum SpO2 during prolonged laryngoscopy in obese patients.

share this

Related Posts

Hypophosphatemia in Critical Care

Summary:In this episode, we spotlight a stealthy ICU disruptor — hypophosphataemia. Based on a 2024 narrative review in the Journal of Clinical Medicine, we explore why phosphate matters, how it goes missing in critically ill patients, and why you should care even when it’s just “a little low.”What’s Covered:The vital role of phosphate in energy,

Read More

Mobilisation in Critical Care- Barriers and Culture

Mobilisation in the ICU raises two big questions: is it safe, and will staff embrace it?In this discussion, Jonathan explores both sides of the story:Safety first:Large prevalence studies show mobilisation is happening, though often inconsistently.A systematic review of 1,800+ sessions found serious adverse events in only 0.6% — most minor and short-lived.Even patients on CRRT can safely mobilise

Read More