August 12
by Jonathan Downham
In this episode, I explore the origins and evolution of the daily sedation hold — also known as the spontaneous awakening trial (SAT) — one of the most influential shifts in ICU sedation practice.
I unpack the key trials that demonstrated SATs could safely reduce ventilation time and ICU stay, and examines how these findings became standard care. But it's not all straightforward — SATs come with implementation challenges, especially when protocols are already in place.
Key topics:
The evidence behind daily sedation interruption
How SATs reduce ventilation and improve survival
Why some ICUs still hesitate to adopt them
What makes implementation successful in real life
How SATs have reframed sedation from passive to purposeful
Kress et al. (2000). Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients.
Girard et al. (2008). Awakening and breathing controlled trial.
Mehta et al. (2012). Daily sedation interruption in protocolized sedation: RCT.
Ferraioli et al. (2019). Quality improvement project on SAT compliance.
Schmidt et al. (2016). ATS/Chest guidelines on sedation minimization
share this
Related Posts
Mobilisation in Critical Care- Barriers and Culture
Mobilisation in the ICU raises two big questions: is it safe, and will staff embrace it?In this discussion, Jonathan explores both sides of the story:Safety first:Large prevalence studies show mobilisation is happening, though often inconsistently.A systematic review of 1,800+ sessions found serious adverse events in only 0.6% — most minor and short-lived.Even patients on CRRT can safely mobilise
Read MoreEpisode 1- Mobilisation in the ICU
SummaryFor much of critical care history, immobility was the norm: patients were sedated, kept still, and “protected.” But decades of research have revealed the hidden costs — profound muscle wasting, delirium, and long-term disability.Jonathan explores how our understanding of mobilisation in ICU has evolved — from the recognition of harm caused by bedrest, to the
Read More