CCP Podcast 085: Papers of the Month March 2018

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | RSS

Gavin Denton and I get together again to review a couple of recent papers that have some bearing on our practice. Welcome to the Papers of the month.

This month we cover Check Up- Position- “A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Ramped Position vs Sniffing Position During Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults” and the APRV trial –BILEVEL-APRV 

A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Ramped Position versus Sniffing Position during Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults

Semler et al, 2017.

 

Clinical question.

In critically ill adults requiring endotracheal intubation, does the ramped position increase the lowest oxygen saturation during rapid sequence induction compared to the supine sniffing position.

 

Design.

• Multi-centre study involving four tertiary hospitals.
• Randomisation in a 1:1 ratio using computer generated blocks, seal envelopes assigned treatment groups and were opened on decision to enrol in the study.
• Unblinded.
• All patients were simultaneously enrolled in a second study involving the use of intubation checklists.
• 80% power to detect a 5% difference in the lowest oxygen saturation level with an alpha level of 0.05, 260 participants required, 260 patients enrolled on an intention to treat basis.

 

Setting.

Patients in critical care.

Conducted in the United States of America.

 

Population.

• Adults.
• 60% were intubated for hypoxia.
• Exclusions were intubation during cardiac arrest, patients requiring cervical spine precautions, and patients requiring urgent intubation. Patients were also excluded if clinicians thought a specific position was required for the procedure to be safely performed.
• All patients received sedation and neuromuscular blockade.
• BMI and use of video laryngoscopy were similar.

 

Intervention/control.

• Ramped position was defined as 25 degrees head up, the occiput was positioned over the end of the mattress, face parallel to the ceiling, sniffing position/ear to sternal notch was achieved using additional pillows or blankets.
• The sniffing position was achieved by placing pillows or blankets under the head to flex the neck forward of the torso and then extension of the neck. Patients were kept supine and pillows under shoulders were not allowed.
• There was no control over the pre-oxygenation position, position was at the operators discretion until the point of induction when the patient had to be positioned according to the assigned treatment arm.

 

Outcome.

• Primary outcome was the lowest oxygen saturation between induction and two minutes after successful intubation. There was no difference (p value 0.027) between the lowest oxygen saturation in either group.

 

• Secondary outcomes;

• First pass success 85.4% in the supine group vs 76.2% in the ramped group (not statistically significant, and not powered for this outcome P value .02). The glottic view obtained was worse in the ramped group.

• A trend towards improved oxygenation in the more severely hypoxic patients, but not powered to look at this subgroup.

 

Author’s conclusion.

The ramped portion does not appear to improve oxygenation during intubation and may result in a worse glottic view and lower the first pass success.

 

Strengths.

• Possibly the first randomised study on intubation position in a critically ill population.
• Multi-centre study.
• Sub-group analysis of operator experience did not have any impact on the results.

 

Weaknesses.

• Non-blinded study, however blinding impossible in this context.
• The study does not inform us on the optimal position to pre-oxygenate.
• Type of laryngoscope was not controlled, but blade type was similar between groups.
• Pre-oxygenaion position is not  controlled for and may confound results.
• It is not clear if the use of a checklists in the parallel study could have confounded the data from this study.
• 53% of patients were ventilated through their apnea, this may also confound the data in regard to patients that were apneic throughout the intubation process.
• There were 46 exclusions, around 20 were in extremis and it is unknown whether there may have been benefit of ramped position in these cases. I suspect these cases may have been electively intubated head up.

 

Bottom line.

This study did not demonstrate a benefit in oxygenation during RSI in the ramped position over the supine position and worsened glottic view and first pass success.

 

APRV trial –BILEVEL-APRV 

 

 

In 2017 Zhou et al published a trial called “Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome.”

In order to understand the trial and the results lets first be clear about what is APRV or Airway Pressure Release Ventilation and its basis on the principle of open lung ventilation. Open-lung ventilation refers to the concept of recruiting the lung and then ventilating gently with small tidal volumes, to avoid either over-distension or atelectotrauma (lung damage from cyclical opening/closing of alveoli).

 

Two levels of PEEP: high (P-high) and low (P-low)

patient breaths spontaneously during P-high and P-low

time in P-high (T-high) is longer than P-low (T-low) to maintain recruitment (85-95%)

results in a degree of autoPEEP due to the short release time (T-low)

 

Advantages

alveolar recruitment and improved oxygenation

preservation of spontaneous breathing

reduction of left ventricular transmural pressure and therefore reduction of left ventricular afterload

potential lung-protective effect

better ventilation of dependent areas

lower sedation requirements to allow spontaneous breathing

 

Disadvantages

risks of volutrauma from increased transpulmonary pressure

increased work of breathing due to spontaneous breathing

increased energy expenditure due to spontaneous breathing

worsening of air leaks (bronchopleural fistula)

Increased right ventricular afterload, worsening of pulmonary hypertension

Reduction of right ventricular venous return: may worsen intracranial hypertension, may worsen cardiac output in hypovolemia

Risk of dynamic hyperinflation

 

There have been animal studies demonstrating that APRV can increase alveolar recruitment gas exchange and therefore reducing lung injury.

The ARDSnet trial established that mechanical ventilation at a six mls per kilo set tidal volume was superior to 12 mls per kilo in patients meeting criteria for ARDS. Several studies since have demonstrated that this target is often not adhered to.

 

The comment in Rob McSweeney’s review is that the use of APRV in patients with ARDS has been led by enthusiasm rather than rigorous evidence of benefit.

As Jonny points out here, ARDS is an inflammatory process leading to increased lung vascular permeability which further leads on to hypoxaemia and reduced lung compliance. As a consequence we tend to ventilate this type of patient with low tidal volume ventilation.

 

The aim of this study therefore was to establish whether the use of APRV will reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation.

So this was a single centre, randomised controlled trial comparing APRV against low tidal volume lung protective ventilation in patients with ARDS conducted in China. Eligible patients were having mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 hours and met the Berlin diagnostic criteria for ARDS.

Amongst the exclusions were those with relative contraindications to APRV including those with barotrauma, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and intracranial hypertension.

You can see from Johnny’s info graphic the settings here in the intervention arm and the primary outcome to be measured was the number of ventilator free days up to date 28.

Secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes (including mortality) and respiratory mechanics.

Overall over 16 months 138 patients were enrolled. Raised intracranial pressure and unexpected early extubation were the commonest exclusion reasons.

So patients in the APRV group had significantly more ventilator free days by day 28 than those in the low tidal volume group-  p value 0.001 more patients receiving APRV were successfully extirpated and fewer required tracking ostomy.

Neuromuscular blockade, prone positioning, nitric oxide or high frequency oscillators ventilation was required in 34% of patients in the low tidal ventilation arm and 8% of patients receiving APRV.

Length of stay was significantly reduced in ICU but not in hospital stay. Intensive care unit mortality and hospital mortality were not significantly reduced with APRV.

At day three patients receiving APRV had significantly lowerFiO2 and higher mean airway pressures and pAO2.

Patients receiving APRV also had a lower mean heart rate and higher mean arterial pressure.

Finally at day three and a seven APRV patients were less sedated by RASS scoring and receiving less sedatives by infusion.

 

Whilst these results also and very encouraging there are a number of problems with this study which should lead us to view the results with care.

Firstly this was a single centre study with relatively small numbers which could mean that rare, but serious adverse events of either therapy may have been missed.

 

The trial was conducted in China which may lead to differences in both the patient population and the type of health care system to that found in the West. Due to the nature of the trial those treating the patients were unblinded to the treatment allocation which could raise a possible bias.

 

Tidal volumes of up to 8 mills per kilo were allowed in the low tidal volume ventilation group. This is higher than that recommended in the ARDSnet trial.

The P low was also set to 5 cm whereas a P low of zero is more commonly advocated.

So due to some of these issues and the fact that the results from this study are not in agreement with previous randomised studies, which have found in the past that APRV leads to increased time to extubation, and also having shown improved outcomes with low tidal volume ventilation in ARDS it is felt that repetition of this study in a large multicentre setting would be advisable.

 

Links

Emcrit- https://emcrit.org/pulmcrit/aprv/

Life in the Fast Lane- https://lifeinthefastlane.com/ccc/airway-pressure-release-ventilation-aprv/

 

 

 

Interview Questions for Advanced Critical Care Practitioners

 

The Content on the website is provided for FREE as is the podcast.

You could help support this work by going to Amazon via this link. This means that I will earn a small commission from any purchases you make with NO extra cost to yourself.

Thank you.

Amazon Link

Podcast Link	Podcast Episode Name
CCP Podcast 001	Introduction and Interview with Teresa Chinn from @WeNurses
CCP Podcast 002	Twitter, Google Hang Outs and Speakpipe
CCP Podcast 003	Interview with Robin Davies, Lead Resuscitation Officer
CCP Podcast 004	Great Medical Podcasts to Listen To
CCP Podcast 005	Chat with Ken Spearpoint
CCP Podcast 006	Chat with David Barton
CCP Podcast 007	Chat with Bethan Bishop
CCP Podcast 008	Chat with Claire Flatt
CCP Podcast 009	SMACC Me Hard!
CCP Podcast 010	Cricoid Pressure: Do it? Do it right? Or do it at all?
CCP Podcast 011	Social Media...Use it, don't abuse it!
CCP Podcast 012	Get my feet to the floor...please!
CCP Podcast 013	Mind and Body
CCP Podcast 014	How Much Fluid?
CCP Podcast 015	The Power of Practitioners?
CCP Podcast 016	The Strong Arm of Eric...YouTube Learning.
CCP Podcast 017	Simon is one of the First 2 Act
CCP Podcast 018	Mechanical Ventilation...
CCP Podcast 019	SepsisPAM analysed. Gav and Jonathan try to work it out!
CCP Podcast 020	More Power to Practitioners
CCP Podcast 021	Jesse's Show
CCP Podcast 022	ACPs Education, Education, Education.
CCP Podcast 023	Wash Your Mouth Out!!
CCP Podcast 024	Mechanical Ventilation...the basics
CCP Podcast 025	Teresa Gets A Gong!
CCP Podcast 026	Crew Resource Management...What?
CCP Podcast 027	Crew Resource Management Continued
CCP Podcast 028	James DuCanto Talks Intubation
CCP Podcast 029	Mechanical Ventilation...Phases of the Breath
CCP Podcast 030	SMACC it!
CCP Podcast 031	Lifesaver to Lightsabre!
CCP Podcast 032	Hello South Africa!
CCP Podcast 033	Calling all students...
CCP Podcast 034	Mechanical Ventilation...Types of breath
CCP Podcast 035	5 Tips for Better Presentations
CCP Podcast 036	Head of Bed Elevation and Reflux
CCP Podcast 037	How to Make Ultrasound Easier!
CCP Podcast 038	WeNurses Tweet Chat About Advanced Practitioners
CCP Podcast 039	Early Mobilisation- Get Them Moving!
CCP Podcast 040	Why Won't We Change?
CCP Podcast 041	PTSD in Critical Care
CCP Podcast 042	What angle should I sit my patient at?
CCP Podcast 043	Why won't my patient sleep?
CCP Podcast 044	Helping the ITU patient sleep
CCP Podcast 045	Simple Things to Help them Sleep
CCP Podcast 046	PTSD in Critical Care II
CCP Podcast 047	Advanced Critical Care Practitioner
CCP Podcast 048	RSI- Which Drug?
CCP Podcast 049	Central Venous Catheter- Which Needle?
CCP Podcast 050	LeoPARDS Trial
CCP Podcast 051	ICU Follow Up Clinics
CCP Podcast 052	Chronic Critical Illness
CCP Podcast 053	Nutrition Guidelines
CCP Podcast 054	Nutrition Guidelines at ICSSOA 2016
CCP Podcast 055	Papers of the Month
CCP Podcast 056	Got to help them cough
CCP Podcast 057	Papers of the Month
CCP Podcast 058	Early Mobilisation. Do we know it works?
CCP Podcast 059	Surviving the ICU: The Patient Experience.
CCP Podcast 060	My Critical Care Patient Can't Swallow! Why?
CCP Podcast 061	Papers of the Month: March 2017
CCP Podcast 062	Escalate the Patient!
CCP Podcast 063	The Two Jonnys Do Twitter: May 2017
CCP Podcast 064	Papers of the Month May 2017
CCP Podcast 065	ACCP Presentation- What, Why, How?
CCP Podcast 066	The Two Jonnys Do Twitter: May 2017 (2)
CCP Podcast 067	Papers of the Month June 2017
CCP Podcast 068	The Two Jonnys Do Twitter: June 2017
CCP Podcast 069	DasSMACC Day 1
CCP Podcast 070	DasSMACC Day 2
CCP Podcast 071	DasSMACC Day 3
CCP Podcast 072	The Two Jonnys Do Twitter: July 2017
CCP Podcast 073	Bariatric Surgery in the Management of the Obese Patient
CCP Podcast 074	Lung Ultrasound with SonoPhysio
CCP Podcast 075	ACP Conference October 2017
CCP Podcast 076	The Two Jonnys Septmber 2017
CCP Podcast 077	NCEPOD 2017 Acute NIV
CCP Podcast 078	NCEPOD 2017 Acute NIV- A Discussion
CCP Podcast 079	The Two Jonnys November 2017
CCP Podcast 080	Nitin does FICE….quickly!
CCP Podcast 081	The Two Jonnys at ICSSOA 2017 (and Dave)
CCP Podcast 082	FICE...Just Do It!
CCP Podcast 083	Guidelines to Tracheal Intubation
CCP Podcast 084	Audits on some ACCPs skills
CCP Podcast 085	Papers of the Month March 2018
CCP Podcast 086	Psychology of patients, relatives and staff
CCP Podcast 087	ECMO- How can I make the best referral?
CCP Podcast 088	Chat about NTI2018
CCP Podcast 089	Cath and Jonathan chat about BTS2018
CCP Podcast 090	Mechanical Ventilation with Thomas
CCP Podcast 091	Practitioners Across The Pond
CCP Podcast 092	Practicing Critical Care Like An Adult
CCP Podcast 093	Recent research with Nicole Kupchik
CCP Podcast 094	Magnesium for the win.
CCP Podcast 095	More mechanical ventilation with Thomas
CCP Podcast 096	Hyponatremia
CCP Podcast 097	ERS Conference 2018
CCP Podcast 098	Bryan talks AKI
CCP Podcast 099	Fluids- Part I
CCP Podcast 100	The Two Jonnys Season Two
CCP Podcast 101	Palliative Care in the ICU
CCP Podcast 102	Dale Needham and Delirium
CCP Podcast 103	Acute Right Heart Failure

Get in touch with Jonathan

I would love to hear from you so that we can start to work together.

• Send an email to contact@criticalcarepractitioner.co.uk
• Use my voicemail service link to the right of this page
• Fill in contact form at the bottom of the page